| The Sunapee Area Watershed Coalition |
| Timeline |
| This timeline was prepared for NH DES as a requirement of the grant SAWC was awarded, and details a schedule for a series of tasks, deliverable results and desired outcomes which will serve as guidelines to achieve the goal of a Watershed Management Plan within a finite amount of time. |
| Task No. |
| TIMELINE |
| TASK |
| DELIVERABLE |
| OUTCOME |
| 1 |
| Mar-06 |
| Analyze water quality data and describe long term phosphorus trends and their relationship to lake water quality. Incorporate scientific literature and water quality models to make determinations about phosphorus contributions from developed areas and potential contributions from undeveloped areas. |
| Watershed Management Plan chapter on water quality |
| Watershed partners understand the dynamics of phosphorus in the Lake Sunapee Watershed |
| 2 |
| Mar-06 |
| Update build-out study |
| Watershed Management Plan chapter on Buildout Study |
| Watershed partners have a current build-out study for the watershed to help describe potential phosphorus loading impacts associated with development |
| 3 |
| Mar-06 |
| Prepare GIS maps showing subwatersheds, land use, impervious cover, and correlate to existing water quality data. |
| Set of GIS maps |
| Watershed partners understand connection between land use water quality, specifically phosphorus |
| 4 |
| Mar-06 |
| Assessment of current zoning and ordinances for watershed communities, including evaluation regarding effectiveness at minimizing impact of development on water quality. |
| Assessment of Zoning and Regulations |
| Watershed partners understand existing zoning and regulations in communities as basis for identifying alternative land use management strategies. |
| 5 |
| Apr-06 |
| Hold a public information session to present water quality data analysis and GIS maps. |
| Public session held. |
| Watershed stakeholders are informed about the impacts of land use within the watershed as it relates to Phosphorus and water quality of the lake. Increased plant growth, algal growth, cyanobacteria, reduced clarity, reduced oxygen with BOD . . . |
| 6 |
| May-06 |
| Prepare and distribute Volume 2 of the Sunapee Area Watershed Coalition Newsletter |
| Newsletter distributed |
| Broad audience of watershed stakeholders understands long term water quality trends and the importance of land use management to the future of Lake Sunapee water quality. |
| 7 |
| Jun-06 |
| SAWC to to analyze public survey. |
| Analysis of survey results |
| LSPA/SAWC will understand which alternatives for dealing with phosphorus are favored by the public and by local land use decision makers, and will understand the limits of that support. |
| 8 |
| Jul-06 |
| Hold a public input session to present the results of the survey and discuss the alternatives recommended by the survey. |
| Public session held |
| Preferred alternatives for addressing phosphorus in the watershed are affirmed by the public. |
| 9 |
| Sep-06 |
| Draft a detailed set of recommended actions based on the data analysis, the public survey, staff input, and SAWC input. |
| Draft action plan |
| A detailed list of recommended actions will be available for public discussion. |
| 10 |
| Sep-06 |
| Scope a potential demonstration project that addresses water quality impacts from development (for example, a pervious pavement installation) |
| Demo project available |
| LSPA prepared to work with DES consultant on design and construction of demonstration project |
| 11 |
| Oct-06 |
| Prepare and distribute Volume 3 of the Sunapee Area Watershed Coalition Newsletter |
| Newsletter distributed |
| Broader audience of watershed stakeholders is informed about the recommended set of detailed actions to address phosphorus in the watershed. |
| 12 |
| Apr-07 |
| Facilitate a series of SAWC meetings to deliberate on the recommended actions, digest public opinion, obtain advice from the Scientific Advisory Committee, and prepare a final draft management plan. |
| Final draft management plan prepared. |
| Recommended actions to address phosphorus in the watershed are thoroughly vetted. |
| 13 |
| Jun-07 |
| Develop a series of guides/brochures to increase awareness and build a good stewardship ethic regarding the recommended actions for managing existing development at the individual lot scale. |
| Guides/brochures prepared. |
| Better informed watershed residents who take actions to reduce phosphorus export from their properties. |
| 14 |
| Jul-07 |
| Present the final draft management plan to each planning board in the watershed at public meetings. |
| Meetings held with the watershed towns’ planning boards. |
| Planning boards are informed about and support the recommended actions to address phosphorus in the watershed through land use management. |
| 15 |
| Sep-07 |
| Based on feedback from planning board meetings, prepare final management plan and hold “State of the Watershed” meeting to begin implementation. |
| Final plan printed and accessible by web; State of the Watershed meeting held. |
| Stakeholders know and understand the actions required to address phosphorus in the watershed, fully support implementation, and begin to implement. |
| 16 |
| Ongoing (January 2006 through December 2007) |
| Develop and maintain website that announces upcoming meetings, includes downloads of relevant documents, and keeps public informed of watershed planning and management activities. |
| Website developed and maintained. |
| Watershed stakeholders have a web site to visit for any information about the watershed plan and recommended actions. |
| 17 |
| Ongoing (January 2006 through December 2007) |
| Continue participation in the Volunteer Lake Assessment Program (50 volunteers X 10 hours/year) |
| Water quality samples collected and analyzed; annual reports completed. |
| Water quality trends are analyzed and provide long-term feedback into the watershed planning process. |
| 18 |
| Ongoing (January 2006 through December 2007) |
| Submit semi-annual progress reports on July 15 and December 15 of each year. Contact DES to discuss and resolve issues that develop between reporting periods. |
| Progress reports submitted. |
| LSPA runs a well-managed watershed planning program and keeps DES informed as an active partner in watershed management. |
| SAWC: The link between land use and water quality |
